RIAA Songs Worth $80 Grand Each Says Judge

Posted by Riaa Lawsuits Suck on 19th June 2009 in RIAA Class Action Lawsuit, RIAA Sucks

RIAAsucks.com just reported last week how Jamie Thomas lawyer was going to mop up the floor with the RIAA prosecution.

Surprisingly enough, the RIAA lawyers mopped up the floor with Jamie Thomas and her lawyer.

A judge ruled that each one of RIAA’s songs is worth $80,000. Jamie Thomas who was charged with downloading (24) songs has been ordered to pay $1.9 Million dollars in damages.

Despite the bluster of the RIAA’s “sue ‘em all” scorched earth legal campaign, they’ve only won one case in court, against Jammie Thomas, a Native American single mother of two from central Minnesota. When contacted by the RIAA Thomas refused to settle for the initial $3,000, instead taking her case to court. In some cases that makes sense — given RIAA evidence is often flimsy or nonexistent — but in Thomas’s case the evidence was clear her family downloaded 24 copyright-protected songs.

When tried in 2007, a jury awarded the music industry $9,250 a song, or $222,000. Last year a Judge declared a mistrial. The case has since been retried, and Thomas has again been found guilty. What’s particularly interesting is the totals: the jury has valued each of the 24 songs at $80,000, for a grand punishment of $1.9 million, which Thomas obviously can’t pay.

The EFF has been quick to jump into the post ruling fray, questioning the constitutionality of awards that are so far distorted from the actual product value.

According to the EFF, the Supreme Court “has made it clear that “grossly excessive” punitive damage awards violate the Due Process clause of the U.S. Constitution.” The EFF also argues that recent court rulings suggest a jury may not award statutory damages for the purpose of imposing fear on others not-involved in the case.

That of course was the entire point of the RIAA’s legal campaign to begin with — to instill fear into those who’d download copyright-protected music. It didn’t work. P2P use continues to soar, and now the RIAA and MPAA are more interested in the idea of forcing ISPs to filter pirated content and boot repeat offenders from their networks.

The ruling will of course buoy the entertainment industry and supporters, though those who’ve watched this cat and mouse game long enough know that piracy simply isn’t going to be stopped — and the entertainment industry’s only real option is to create new, compelling business models that can somehow “compete with free.”

Share/Save

RIAA Days Are Numbered

Posted by Riaa Lawsuits Suck on 10th June 2009 in RIAA Class Action Lawsuit, RIAA Sucks

RiaaSucks.com Tipster Writes:

“Ars has an excellent write up outlining how Kiwi Camara (Jammie Thomas-Rasset’s new lawyer) is following the ‘Best Defense is a Good Offense’ philosophy and going on the attack against the RIAA. Not content to just defend his client, he is laying siege against the RIAA’s entire campaign and beginning the work of dismantling it from the bottom up, starting with the question of whether they actually do own the copyrights that were allegedly infringed. And, if you’re thinking this is good for everyone who’s been harassed by the RIAA, you’d be right — Camara, along with Harvard Law professor Charles Nesson, plans to file a class-action suit seeking to force the RIAA to return all the (ill-gotten) money they’ve earned from their litigation campaign.”

I like the way this lawyer thinks… When you’re dealing with a bunch of bottom feeder pimps fish - offense is the best defense.

Share/Save

62 New RIAA Cases Filed in April 09

Posted by Riaa Lawsuits Suck on 10th May 2009 in RIAA Sucks, Recording Industry Association

RIAA cases keep spreading like the Swine flu. 

RIAAsucks.com Inside sources are reporting:

“Based upon a quick examination of the records in PACER, I detected 62 new cases brought by the RIAA against individuals in the month of April alone. In December, 2008, the RIAA had represented to Congress that they had ‘discontinued initiating new lawsuits in August [2008].’”

RIAAsucks.com wants to hear from these 62 unlucky individuals ASAP!

Share/Save

RIAA Hard Drive Inspection Rules layed out by Court

Posted by Riaa Lawsuits Suck on 7th May 2009 in RIAA Sucks, Recording Industry Association

RIAASucks.com inside sources are reporting:

“In a Boston RIAA case, SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum, the Court has issued a detailed protective order establishing strict protocols for the RIAA’s requested inspection of the defendant’s hard drive, in order to protect the defendant’s privacy. The order (PDF) provides that the hard drive will be turned over to a computer forensics expert of the RIAA’s choosing, for mirror imaging, but that only the forensics expert — and not the plaintiffs or their attorneys — will be able to examine the mirror image.

The forensics expert will then issue a report which will describe (a) any music files found on the drive, (b) any file-sharing information associated with each file, and any other records of file-sharing activity, and (c) any evidence that the hard-drive has been ‘wiped’ or erased since the initiation of the litigation. The expert will be precluded from examining ‘any non-relevant files or data, including … emails, word-processing documents, PDF documents, spreadsheet documents, image files, video files, or stored web-pages.’”

Good to see peoples private rights are going to be restricted from the RIAA… But, who is monitoring the RIAA to make sure they are snooping where they shouldn’t be?

Share/Save

RIAA.com Hacked… AGAIN!

Posted by Riaa Lawsuits Suck on 4th May 2009 in RIAA Sucks, Recording Industry Association

Last year we reported that the RIAA’s website had suffered an XSS attack and just a couple of days ago we revealed how the MPAA site was vulnerable to an XSS attack too, one which left it embarrassingly displaying torrents from The Pirate Bay.

Now it is the RIAA’s turn (AGAIN) to suffer the same fate. Vektor, who also discovered the MPAA site exploit, told TorrentFreak that he had managed to find a security hole in RIAA.com too. He demonstrated this by using an iframe - an HTML element which makes it possible to embed an HTML document inside another HTML document - TorrentFreak for example.

RIAA Hacked... LOLIn the 48 laws of power it says “beware of wolves in sheeps clothing.” The chiefs at RIAA must have never studied the 48 laws. Step your website game up RIAA!

Share/Save

How can ISP’s Monitor customers for Piracy without breaking privacy laws?

Posted by Riaa Lawsuits Suck on 28th April 2009 in Law & Ethics
goodboy_19_2004 asked:

In this paragraph it stats that the RIAA will have isp’s help catch piracy, just like the MPAA, how can this happen without monitoring its customers, and if so isn’t that a break in privacy laws?

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2337294,00.asp

Share/Save

Is it legal to give 30 second previews of albums I own on my website?

Posted by Riaa Lawsuits Suck on 28th April 2009 in Law & Ethics
mecablaze asked:

These albums are commercial, so I don’t want the RIAA filing charges against me…

Share/Save

What to do with old illegal music files on PC?

Posted by Riaa Lawsuits Suck on 28th April 2009 in RIAA Sucks
josh p asked:

What should one do with existing illegal music files if they wish to stop the practice of downloading and want to avoid legal action ?

Does the RIAA have a position on this scenario ?
Can a person have legal action taken against them for dowloads that may have taken place years ago before they were aware of the RIAA’s crusade against individuals ?

Share/Save

How do u hide ur ip address while downloading from torrents sites?

Posted by Riaa Lawsuits Suck on 27th April 2009 in Software
toocool4skool asked:

i use peergurdian but am afraid my ip address is still visible to those riaa sniffers. what else do people use to make their torrent downloading safe from such?

Share/Save

How can I download torrents with Azureus and conceal my identity?

Posted by Riaa Lawsuits Suck on 27th April 2009 in Security
man asked:

The RIAA, MPAA, etc. file lawsuits for downloading torrents based on the list of IP addresses of all the peers (ie I can see who my peers are, based on the list of IPs).

They figure out who you are, based on IPs. How can I “change/proxy” my IP address in the “peers” list. ie my IP is 72.840.21.373, pbut it shows a false one, like 54.771.03.13
There is Tor and I2P, but do thoput up a false IP instead of your true IP, so that the RIAA dogs don’t find you?
If yes, HOW do you configure them to work with Azureus?

P.S. When I use a webproxy, the site I visit “recieves” a false IP, concealing my identity. How can I do the same with torrents (Azureus)? AND does it work with concealing just WHAT I download from my ISP???

Finally, how do I make Azureus 100% anonymous, from users to the RIAA to my ISP?

Share/Save

Just Say No To RIAA. RIAA Sucks!

Got a Hot RIAA Tip? Email us! tips@riaasucks.com